Re: 512M RAM support

["Boo Geum Jung" <bgjung%etri.re.kr@localhost>]

Thank you very much!
I thinks so, it's not easy job and very complicated work.
I worried about that too much.
We've made our own board and it has 512M RAM now.
We'll use it with NetBSD/Ramdisk. So we need a lot of memory space.
I'm working with netbsd-current version.
Could you send me the changes for tiral if there'll take some time to
commit?
If more 512M is needed, upto 1G memory is supported in your implementation?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Thomas" <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>
To: "Boo Geum Jung" <bgjung%etri.re.kr@localhost>; 
<port-powerpc%netbsd.org@localhost>
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: 512M RAM support


> At 11:18 PM 6/16/2002, Boo Geum Jung wrote:
> >Is it possible to use 512M Ram (2 SEGMENT_LENGTH for KERNEL_ADDRESS) for
> >mpc6xx architecture?
> >If so, could you tell me where to change from the source tree?
> >I guess sys/arch/powepc/include/mpc6xx/vmparam.h,
> >sys/arch/powerpc/mpc6xx/pmap.c, etc should be modified.
>
> It's not that simple.  In fact, a bunch of changes need to made.
> I'll try to get that committed sometime this week.  I have those
> changes done for 1.5.
>
>
> --
> Matt Thomas               Internet:   matt%3am-software.com@localhost
> 3am Software Foundry      WWW URL:
http://www.3am-software.com/bio/matt/
> Cupertino, CA             Disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message
>