[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: radeonfb vs. Mac Mini
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 04:31:13 +0300
Valery Ushakov <uwe%stderr.spb.ru@localhost> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 14:10:47 -0400, Michael wrote:
> > I committed a few changes to radeonfb lately which make it work
> > properly on my Mini, with both DVI and VGA output.
> > My Mini is the 'silent upgrade' model, PowerMac10,2 as per Open
> > Firmware. The DVI port is wired slightly different on first
> > generation Minis ( PowerMac10,1 ), I *think* I set it up correctly
> > but I have no way to test this.
> I have tested it on the early mini with DVI and, unfortunately, it
> doesn't seem to work. The screen is black.
> radeonfb0 at pci0 dev 16 function 0found EDID property...
> : ATI Technologies Radeon 9200 5962 (rev. 0x01)
> radeonfb0: Video BIOS not present
> radeonfb0: No video BIOS, using default clocks
> radeonfb0: refclk = 27.000 MHz, refdiv = 12 minpll = 125000, maxpll =
> 400000 radeonfb0: 64 MB aperture at 0x98000000, 64 KB registers at
> 0x90000000 radeonfb0: display 0: initial virtual resolution 1920x1200
> at 8 bpp radeonfb0: using 32 MB per display
> radeonfb0: port 0: physical 1920x1200 60Hz
> radeonfb0: port 1: physical 1920x1200 60Hz
> wsdisplay0 at radeonfb0 kbdmux 1: console (fb, vt100 emulation)
Looks ok so far...
> display-type 4c434400 ........ ........ ........ LCD.
... ok, so it's a DVI monitor. Any way you could test with a VGA
Also, does X work ( with an updated radeon driver ) ? Doesn't matter if
it's on top of genfb or radeonfb, it should Just Work without any
config file hackery. I tried to replicate their Mini workarounds in
radeonfb, I'd like to know if the original works before looking into my
> PS: Please, can this "found EDID property" in copy_disp_props() be
Will do, that should be Very Verbose Debug Output(tm)...
thanks for testing!
Main Index |
Thread Index |