Hi, > > If a PR would be a good idea, I can file one - or three, if that'd be > > better. > Imho, the whole code for the partitioning (mbr and disk label) of sysinst > should be worked on. The current "two-phase" model (first setting size, then > setting options for the FS) is unnecessary and overall the code for the > partitioning is very complicated. > I'll have to dig into the partitioning code soon again anyway, and a simple > partitioning would make my work much better, so I could try to solve these > issues and provide patches. > But don't expect me to finish that in the next few weeks, so rather file a > PR for that if you want to have it done reliably. I finally had a look at the code and have to take back that claim: The current code is complicated, but considering the checks that need to be done and all the questions asked for, I cannot think of an easier way of doing this. Regards, Julian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature