Re: booting Beaglebone Black

[Brook Milligan <brook%nmsu.edu@localhost>]

> On Jul 7, 2024, at 11:59 AM, Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
> 
> The official 10.0 image just is too old for the change (and it is usually
> not rebuild). But if you can verify the -10 images work, we can force
> a one-time rebuild of the 10.0 images.

Yes, 10.0 + uboot 2022.04 (and 2024.04) boots fine.  I have not tested this with the armbsd images, e.g., by replacing the bootloader, but I have compiled plenty of my own systems with either 2022.04 or 2024.04 u-boot, and one is running fine right now.

I see no downside to replacing the 10.0 image with one that boots.  I think all that is needed is to run installboot on the existing image.

If the image gets replaced, I’m happy to give it a spin; just let me know.

Thanks.

Cheers,
Brook