Port-arm archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Volunteer for "Add FFS support to U-Boot"



I don’t think you need the extra cmd argument. You should be able to detect ffsv1/ffsv2 by looking at fs_magic in the superblock (either FS_UFS1_MAGIC or FS_UFS2_MAGIC).

The (c) 2008 files are missing attribution (“contributed to The NetBSD Foundation by”). I think you put the wrong SPDX-License-Identifier tag in those files as well, see Licenses/README.


> On Feb 19, 2018, at 5:02 PM, berte <behzaterte%yandex.com@localhost> wrote:
> 
> Some modifications are done and pushed ufs_taks01_02_part1_done tag.
> 
> Jared, I added +1 argument into uboot_cmd which is type argument and it'll define filesystem types such as ffsv1,ffsv2, lfs, etc.(but I've to need some know-how for u-boot  stuff)
> 
> Besides, I'm still open to all suggestions :-)
> 
> 
> 
> 19.02.2018, 16:39, "berte" <behzaterte%yandex.com@localhost>:
>> Okay I can handle both version at the same time and also update licenses :-)
>> 
>> 19.02.2018, 17:21, "Jared McNeill" <jmcneill%invisible.ca@localhost>:
>>>  I noticed that the config option is defined as a choice between v1 and v2. I think it would be better if we could have both at the same time. Would that be difficult to change?
>>> 
>>>  FWIW, currently the armv7/arm64 images use ffsv1 due of complications between ffsv2 and resize_ffs.
>>> 
>>>  It looks like some of the code in your patchset is derived from libsa — make sure you keep track of licenses etc.
>>> 
>>>>   On Feb 19, 2018, at 9:18 AM, berte <behzaterte%yandex.com@localhost> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>   Hey Jared,
>>>> 
>>>>   At the moment I can not guarantee for v1 but v2 probably works as expected ( I'm still wondering about DEV_STRATEGY and alignment macro). Let me quick check for v1 today.
>>>> 
>>>>   After that, I'm going to try with my arm evb.
>>>> 
>>>>   Do you have any suggestion/feedback?
>>>> 
>>>>   19.02.2018, 17:09, "Jared McNeill" <jmcneill%invisible.ca@localhost>:
>>>>>   Super cool. Would it be hard to support both FFSv1 and v2 at the same time?
>>>>> 
>>>>>>    On Feb 19, 2018, at 5:47 AM, berte <behzaterte%yandex.com@localhost> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    Hey Jared,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    I've done with task01-02 you can find those changes into same repository ufs_task01_02_code_review tag.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    :::: Task summary ::::
>>>>>>    - Add an ffs driver to U-Boot (read-only) -> done
>>>>>>    - Add the following commands to U-Boot: ffssize, ffsload, ffsls -> done
>>>>>>    - Integrate changes with existing U-Boot packages (sysutils/u-boot*) in pkgsrc -> wip
>>>>>>    - Update armv7.img to support booting directly from FFS. -> tba
>>>>>>    - Modify sysinst to allow for installation without an MSDOS partition. -> tba
>>>>>>       Some of this will be SoC-specific. Need to detect the SoC type and select the correct kernel/dtb and adjust partition layout to not interfere with U-Boot / SoC specific bootloaders.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    Cheers,
>>>>>>    --berte.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    18.02.2018, 23:40, "berte" <behzaterte%yandex.com@localhost>:
>>>>>>>    Jared, you can find my u-boot git repository as below,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    https://github.com/berte/u-boot/compare/master...berte:ufs
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    Cheers,
>>>>>>>    --berte.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    18.02.2018, 15:59, "Jared McNeill" <jmcneill%invisible.ca@localhost>:
>>>>>>>>     Sounds great!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>      On Feb 18, 2018, at 8:52 AM, berte <behzaterte%yandex.com@localhost> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>      Hey Jared, thanks for your quick response :-)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>      At the moment, I added ffsv1/v2 into Kconfig file also I'll separate source code a bit later.
>>>>>>>>>      On the other hand, I can add whole variants into u-boot, however my main port strategy is ffsv1/v2 but I'm open to suggestions :-)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>      Btw, I can create github repo for this task, what do you think about that?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>      Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>      --berte.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>      18.02.2018, 15:41, "Jared McNeill" <jmcneill%invisible.ca@localhost>:
>>>>>>>>>>      Looks like you’re on the right path. Do you have a plan for dealing with different UFS variants (FFSv1, FFSv2, LFS, etc)?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>       On Feb 18, 2018, at 8:21 AM, berte <behzaterte%yandex.com@localhost> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>       Hi Jared,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>       I made some changes for u-boot however I'm not sure whatever I'm right or wrong way.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>       Few question about source:
>>>>>>>>>>>       - I guess ufs alignment changes by architecture but I removed that macro in alloc/dealloc functions. Maybe I can replace with u-boot specific alignment function?
>>>>>>>>>>>       - Also DEV_STRATEGY macro no make sense to me and I commented out that.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>       I'm still continue with fs_type .read but you can find my early work patch file as an attachment.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>       Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>       Behzat
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>       16.02.2018, 00:13, "Jared McNeill" <jmcneill%invisible.ca@localhost>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>       Perfect! Good luck!
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>        On Feb 15, 2018, at 5:06 PM, berte <behzaterte%yandex.com@localhost> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>        I've already compile uboot master branch for orange pi win, currently I'm working on ffs filesystem port for uboot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>        I've some obstacles but still proceeding if stuck with it than I'll ping you back :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>        Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>        --berte.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>        15.02.2018, 23:58, "Jared McNeill" <jmcneill%invisible.ca@localhost>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        Aarch64 should be fine here on the Orange Pi Win, but be aware that building U-Boot for sun50i family boards is a bit more complicated than others due to the dependency on ARM Trusted Framework.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        There is a U-Boot framework in pkgsrc (currently based on 2017.11 release) that you may want to use as a starting point. Creating a package for your board will be simple:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         $ cd /usr/pkgsrc/sysutils
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         $ cp -r u-boot-pine64 u-boot-orangepi-win
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         $ cd u-boot-orangepi-win
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         $ vi DESCR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         (Change last line of description to match your board name)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         $ vi Makefile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         (Change UBOOT_TARGET to orangepi-win, UBOOT_CONFIG to orangepi_win_defconfig, remove PKGREVISION)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         $ vi PLIST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         (Change share/u-boot/pine64 to share/u-boot/orangepi-win)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        That should give you a working u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        Jared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         On Feb 15, 2018, at 4:46 PM, berte <behzaterte%yandex.com@localhost> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         I've raspberry pi (v1), orange pi zero and orange pi win. So I can quickly change architecture if aarch64 not suitable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         15.02.2018, 23:42, "Jared McNeill" <jmcneill%invisible.ca@localhost>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         What board are you using?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          On Feb 15, 2018, at 3:31 PM, berte <behzaterte%yandex.com@localhost> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          Hi Jared,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          Thanks for your support.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          I'll start with u-boot master branch and also I want to compile that for aarch64, is it okay for you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          -- berte.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          15.02.2018, 20:05, "Jared McNeill" <jmcneill%invisible.ca@localhost>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          Hi berte --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          Do you have any specific questions in mind?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          Jared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, berte wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           I want to work for this title so could you please guide me about that ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           --berte.
>>>>>>>>>>>       <diff.output>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    --
>>>>>>    Cheers,
>>>>>>    --berte.
>>>> 
>>>>   --
>>>>   Cheers,
>>>>   --berte.
>> 
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> --berte.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> --berte.
> 




Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index