Re: ATF test result (2012/09/09, -current)

[SAITOH Masanobu <msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost>]

(2012/09/10 18:46), Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
>  Hi.
> 
>  The latest result:
> 
>       -O2 version:
>       http://www.netbsd.org/~msaitoh/atf/atf20120909/atf-run-disk.html
> 
>       -O0 version:
>       http://www.netbsd.org/~msaitoh/atf/atf20120909/atf-run-O0.html
> 
> The difference:
> 
>       All of libm tests passed with -O0
>       t_tls_dloen and t_ssp failed

I tried -O1, too:

        http://www.netbsd.org/~msaitoh/atf/atf20120909/atf-run-O1.html

The number of failed test cases reduced to 18.

http://www.netbsd.org/~msaitoh/atf/

summary:

                -O2     -O1     -O0
ipf             fail    fail    fail
siginfo         fail    fail    fail
protoent        fail    fail    fail
libc/tls        pass    pass    fail
libc/ssp        pass    pass    fail
libm            fail    pass    pass
libpthread      fail    fail    pass
carp            fail    pass    fail
net/icmp/ping   pass    pass    fail
resize_ffs      fail    fail    fail
------------------------------------
total           36      18      36

-- 
-----------------------------------------------
                SAITOH Masanobu (msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost
                                 msaitoh%netbsd.org@localhost)