Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost> writes: >> /rescue was of no use because its copy of tar had the same >> dependencies. Wouldn't it be better if basic utilities in /rescue >> were statically linked? > > You mean they're not?! They are in every version I run, and if they're > not in 9.2 I would consider that a catastrophic regression. Indeed, I > would almost say that's half the point of /rescue. Mouse: I'm glad you are well; had you not ranted I would have been concerned. But, looking at the rescue set unpacked: $ file rescue/ls rescue/ls: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, for NetBSD 9.2, stripped
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature