Re: Port specific man pages

[James Chacon <chacon.james%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Christos Zoulas 
<christos%zoulas.com@localhost> wrote:
> On Dec 21,  2:03pm, chacon.james%gmail.com@localhost (James Chacon) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: Port specific man pages
>
> | On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Christos Zoulas 
> <christos%astron.com@localhost> wrot=
> | e:
> | > In article 
> <CAA1X9Ueyg_2U=3DMOPjkqa4NwMK21ZWQXsNdO54hHje0AoWRqd0A%mail.gm@localhost=
> | ail.com>,
> | > James Chacon =A0<chacon.james%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
> | >>
> | >>Basically the default search path doesn't work except for the direct
> | >>mapping to $ARCH only. For i386/amd64 they really need to pickup x86
> | >>by default also. I'll look at it tonight.
> | >
> | > When did you last update /etc/man.conf?
> | >
> |
> | I originally installed a 5.1 image on this box then did a -current
> | build, unpacked it and did postinstall. So if that skipped man.conf
> | updates there's a bug somewhere.
> |
> | I see they are different when I look in src/etc so easy fix. Wonder
> | why postinstall didn't catch this?
>
> It does not know about man.conf, perhaps someone should teach it.
>

Yep, agreed. I'll look at that.

James