Re: successful boot report

[Michael Kronsteiner <alphamike%gmx.at@localhost>]

On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 14:10 +0300, Staffan Thomén wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:16:41AM +0300, ..I'd rather be coding ASM! wrote:
> > 
> > There was two versions of the 164, the LX and SX if memory serves.
> > Only one of them was 'complete' enough to run VMS/Tru64, the other
> > was WinNT and Linux only.
> 
> Heh, sleepy, Al? Surely you remember my machine. There are in fact three
> EB164 versions, the SX, one without letters, and LX. As far as I've been able
> to find out, the SX only supports lower clock cpus, while the unnamed goes up
> to 500MHz and the LX can handle higher ones.. I have a fuzzy memory about 
> there
> being differences in cache size as well.

The sx boards i own all have a 533mhz cpu installed 
>