Aleksej Saushev <asau%inbox.ru@localhost> writes:
> Fredrik Pettai <pettai%nordu.net@localhost> writes:
>
>> On 11/10/09 11:06 PM, Larson, Timothy E. wrote:
>>>> How does it differ from new BSD?
>>>
>>> I guess the terms are substantially the same as the 3-clause version,
>>> except that the copyright isn't to UCBerkeley, etc etc.
>>
>> You can use this in the Makefile, which I do for missing licenses
>>
>> LICENSE= xxx-license
>> LICENSE_FILE= ${FILESDIR}/xxx-license
>>
>> (and add the licens to the files directory for that package)
>
> Common opinion is using "modified-bsd" for all BSD licences where terms
> are equivalent and only copyright holder differs.
Definitely. LICENSE= is meant to denote the terms, not who holds copyright.
If we did that we'd need a fancier filesystem to hold all the license files....
Attachment:
pgpEi2uLW0HBB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________ pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss