"David H. Gutteridge" <david%gutteridge.ca@localhost> writes: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 at 08:30:31 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: >> netbsd-9, up-to-date pkgsrc-current. >> >> It is complaining about the fuse version being old: >> >> checking for FUSE... no >> configure: error: Package requirements (fuse >= 2.8.0) were not met: >> >> Package dependency requirement 'fuse >= 2.8.0' could not be satisfied. >> Package 'fuse' has version '2.6.0', required version is '>= 2.8.0' >> >> and I happen to have fuse 2.9.3, but I think fuse.buildlink3.mk is >> selecting the builtin fuse. >> >> I am guessing this is fallout from some recent change, but I'm curious >> if others see it too. > > Yes, I'm seeing it too, and it appears in mef@'s latest bulk build > report: > http://www.ki.nu/pkgsrc/reports/current/NetBSD-9.0/20220426.0431/gvfs-1.6.7nb59/configure.log > > Until last week, fuse wasn't a default-on option for NetBSD in gvfs, > but someone changed that, so now it fails to build, given the buildlink > issue you noted. (This in turn causes the Xfce4 meta-pkgs to fail to > build, since Thunar and related plugins still have dependencies on gvfs > for particular bits.) nia@ has just worked around this; fuse is now default on NetBSD only on NetBSD-current. (I suspect there is still a bug in the fuse bl3.)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature