[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Binary naming conventions for projects written in python
Aleksej Lebedev writes:
> What is the naming convention that allows to have both versions binaries
> from each
> of these packages? Should I follow python's scheme: conan2.7 + conan3.6
> & distro2.7 + distro3.6?
I have tried to bring this up recently on tech-pkg@ but AFAIK there
is no convention:
> If yes, should these packages provide symlinks conan -> conan2 ->
> conan2.7, etc?
This is automatically handled by pkgtools/pkg_alternatives if
installed, so, for example for wip/conan, after populating
...and rebuilding with it pkg_alternatives installed,
corresponding wrappers will be created as needed.
Main Index |
Thread Index |