On 20.12.2016 14:45, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 02:13:53PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >> On 20.12.2016 13:56, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 01:45:28PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >>>> On 19.12.2016 21:57, Thomas Klausner wrote: >>>>> lang/gcc45 >>>>> lang/gcc46 >>>>> lang/gcc46-libs >>>>> lang/gcc47 >>>>> lang/gcc47-libs >>>>> >>>> >>>> Are these ones really necessary? They are still used. >>> >>> By whom and why can't they use gcc48 or gcc49? >>> >>> Joerg >>> >> >> I use them and I don't need C++11 there. >> >> These packages are still officially maintained by sbd%NetBSD.org@localhost. > > You haven't answered the second half of the question. Given that the > account of Steven is suspended, that doesn't account for much. > > Joerg > I don't have use-cases in pkgsrc. It could be moved to pkgsrc-wip for people who still want these versions for their internal tasks.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature