Re: removing teTeX packages after 2016Q3

["John D. Baker" <jdbaker%mylinuxisp.com@localhost>]

On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 23:18:28 +0200, Thomas Klausner <tk%giga.or.at@localhost>
wrote:

> teTeX is dead for over 10 years now (May 2006). Upstream suggests
> using texlive instead.

The teTeX DESCR has basically said this for some time.  In the meantime
most of the guts were replaced with their texlive counterparts anyway.

> The pkgsrc texlive packages are getting better every branch. I'll
> remove the remaining teTeX packages after the 2016Q3 branch.

As such, I've viewed "print/teTeX" as an effective meta-package that
continued to install a fairly complete (possibly overkill?) TeX system
from mostly texlive components.

Last I looked, I didn't see any equivalent meta-package for "texlive".
Will there be one?  Otherwise, "texlive" seems to be completely "a la
carte" and I haven't tried wading through it to figure out the pieces
necessary for me. 

Suggestions so I know what to expect post-pkgsrc-2016Q3?

Thanks.

-- 
|/"\ John D. Baker, KN5UKS               NetBSD     Darwin/MacOS X
|\ / jdbaker[snail]mylinuxisp[flyspeck]com    OpenBSD            FreeBSD
| X  No HTML/proprietary data in email.   BSD just sits there and works!
|/ \ GPGkeyID:  D703 4A7E 479F 63F8 D3F4  BD99 9572 8F23 E4AD 1645