Re: History behind pkgsrc 'biology' category

[Patrick Welche <prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost>]

On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 08:21:42PM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
> If  you wanted to go on a packaging rampage and add chemistry or physics
> that's probably fine.  "engineering" seems too vague a category to be
> useful, given what we have already, although we have math.

I would say that many of the "biology" packages are standard issue
physics / theoretical chemistry programs already, so maybe it should
be taken to mean "science", and add physics, etc., packages to "biology".

Cheers,

Patrick