pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Retirement of Ruby 1.8.7

Thanks.  It sounds like evidence tends towards amarok-kde3 being
appropriate to delete, especially if no one speaks up.

  >  - Would amarok-kde3 be a candidate for deletion in its own right?

Sorry, what I meant was:  Suppose there were no issue about ruby, but
that one was looking around pkgsrc for packages that are dead upstream
and probably have no users.  Would amarok-kde3 be such a package?

Thanks for answering my queries.  I don't have any objection to you
proceeding as you proposed.   I'm really asking because I think the
questions I asked should be part of any removal discussion; usually the
proposer knows the answers, but others don't.

Attachment: pgpP0K64wLIKG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index