Re: 2013Q3 freeze pre-announcement

[Taylor R Campbell <campbell+netbsd-tech-pkg%mumble.net@localhost>]

   Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:27:18 +0200
   From: Pierre Pronchery <khorben%defora.org@localhost>

   When signing with "gpg", it requires an implementation (probably
   security/gnupg) to be installed and available. This may be problematic
   for bulk builds, because this binary would then need to be bootstrapped
   first in some way - without signing its package obviously.

Why would security/gnupg be a problem for bulk builds any more than
pkgtools/pbulk, net/rsync, &c.?