[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Remove of Ruby 1.9.2 support
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 13:59:41 +0900, David Holland
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 01:11:45PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> Before pkgsrc-2012Q1, default ruby was switched to 1.9.3.
> I feel that a half year is sufficient for migration.
...but changing the default is not the same as announcing that we're
about to remove the older one.
> >Also theoretically we're supposed to announce package removals one
> >full quarterly branch ahead of actually doing them.
> For this case, ruby-1.9.2 v.s. 1.9.3, it is micro version differ.
Well, yes, but if it weren't important, we wouldn't have both versions
I would still prefer removing it after the branch (and not necessarily
worry about whether e.g. a rails update breaks it) but I'm not going
to argue any further.
Probably, you have a misunderstanding about the reason why currently
ruby-1.9.2 and 1.9.3 co-exist in pkgsrc.
If ruby-1.9.3 is ready in pkgsrc, there are no reason to keep 1.9.2.
OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost
Main Index |
Thread Index |