On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:40:50 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 01:24:02PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:I see... using *.xz archive, so marked as build depend on archive/xz, but check-shlib claims using shlibs from build depends. It's false alarm.I can reproduce it now. It is *not* a false alarm. libxml2 should be pulling in a full xz dependency, since libxml2.so depends on it now, but it only gets counted as build dependency.
No, not only directly build dependency, but also indirectly full dependency. In other words, directly build dependency on `xzcat' command from archive/xz, and indirect full dependency on `liblzma' from archive/xz. -- OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost