Re: gnu-gpl-v1 license?

["OBATA Akio" <obache%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:56:23 +0900, Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost> 
wrote:

> "Pouya D. Tafti" <pouya%san-serriffe.org@localhost> writes:
>
> > I am packaging some software licensed under gnu-gpl-v1 for pkgsrc, and
> > was somewhat surprised to see that v1 is not included in licenses/.
> > Any particular reason for that?
>
> No.  I suspect it's not included only because almost all useful software
> has been updated to gplv2 at least.

I found that doc/NeTraMet/copyright.notice of security/netramet said

   GNU EMACS GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
      (Clarified 11 Feb 1988)

Is it the older one than gplv1?

--
OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost