[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: gnu-gpl-v1 license?
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:56:23 +0900, Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>
"Pouya D. Tafti" <pouya%san-serriffe.org@localhost> writes:
I am packaging some software licensed under gnu-gpl-v1 for pkgsrc, and
was somewhat surprised to see that v1 is not included in licenses/.
Any particular reason for that?
No. I suspect it's not included only because almost all useful software
has been updated to gplv2 at least.
I found that doc/NeTraMet/copyright.notice of security/netramet said
GNU EMACS GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
(Clarified 11 Feb 1988)
Is it the older one than gplv1?
OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost
Main Index |
Thread Index |