[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: [HEADS UP] Package removal -- please check
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:45:11PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:52:04 +0100
> From: Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>
> Message-ID: <20110218095204.GJ13800%danbala.tuwien.ac.at@localhost>
> | x11/xteddy2
> Is that gtk1? I thought xteddy was gtk1 and xteddy2 was gtk2?
> (another imlib inheritance I guess, but if all the indirect ones are
> getting found, what happened to xdaemon2?)
imlib, correct, and I used finddepends to find the dependencies, which
doesn't match DEPENDS like xdaemon2 uses.
> That one has been known to be used ... both as itself, and as a
> requirement of xdaemon2 (which is how one views the beastie ...)
So I gather we keep xdaemon2 and xteddy2 for now. Can't go without
Someone interested in porting xdaemon2 to imlib2?
Main Index |
Thread Index |