[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: xemacs and xemacs-packages
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:18:17AM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> 1. xemacs is useful in these days?
> 2. xemacs-packags contains lot of modules for xemacs, and some of them are
> also provided by pkgsrc.
> 1) for xemacs, which is preferred, if both xemacs-packages and site-lisp
> are installed?
> 2) Do we need to maintain both for xemacs? for example, xemacs-packags
> SKK, but inputmethod/skk also must support xemacs?
I once tried to convert all emacs lisp packages to support XEmacs.
I gave up that because most of them don't simply support XEmacs.
IMO XEmacs should use only xemacs-packages. Developer's life (==
time) is more important than saving disk space.
Main Index |
Thread Index |