Re: xemacs and xemacs-packages

[Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%tombi.co.jp@localhost>]

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:18:17AM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 1. xemacs is useful in these days?
> 
> 2. xemacs-packags contains lot of modules for xemacs, and some of them are
>    also provided by pkgsrc.
>    1) for xemacs, which is preferred, if both xemacs-packages and site-lisp
>       are installed?
>    2) Do we need to maintain both for xemacs? for example, xemacs-packags 
> contains
>       SKK, but inputmethod/skk also must support xemacs?

I once tried to convert all emacs lisp packages to support XEmacs.
I gave up that because most of them don't simply support XEmacs.

IMO XEmacs should use only xemacs-packages.  Developer's life (==
time) is more important than saving disk space.