[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: what happened to adjustkernel?
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Martin S. Weber wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:50:52PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 04:19:59PM -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
I'm fishing through the CVS logs. I was just using it last week, so I'm
not sure why it's gone.
I removed it since PR 17761 claims it was functionally broken since
2002 -- is that not correct?
The last times I tried it it left out some intermediate busses all
the time, but those were easy to add (didn't try to fix it as I
don't like (looking at) perl). E.g. atapibus at, atabus at were
always lacking. But these are a) pretty easily added manually once
you know that or b) shouldn't be too hard to fix for either the
original author (if he still can read it) or any other perl coder?
Removing it seems a bit brutal to me (but also a very understandable
indication that you don't want to mess with perl either :)).
It's broken, but it's a better starting point than just guessing at what
to comment out in GENERIC. I've not tried dmassage, but can't you just
add it back saying that it's a starting point for kernel customization?
I use it fairly often when I get a new system.
Hisashi T Fujinaka - htodd%twofifty.com@localhost
BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) + MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte
Main Index |
Thread Index |