[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:08:25PM -0500, spam%y2009.dberg.net@localhost wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:34:04PM +0200, kordex - wrote:
> > Bin-ary packages are out of my scope of interest as they are mostly
> > available only x86 anyways, besides that seamonkey is rarely used i
> > think so I vote for removal.
> Just to be explicit, if by "seamonkey is rarely used" you mean
> www/seamonkey-bin, then I'm neutral about the above claim/vote.
> Otherwise, I dissent: I definitely use www/seamonkey, and request
> its retention.
I am talking about www/seamonkey-bin-nightly, not seamonkey-bin.
The latter is not as problematic as the former.
Main Index |
Thread Index |