pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: libXrender broken also.[SEC = UNCLASSIFIED]



On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:46:11 +1000
"Paul (NCC/CS.)" <pts%bom.gov.au@localhost> wrote:

> On Sun, 2007-08-26 at 21:30 -0400, César Catrián Carreño wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:58:43 +1000
> > "Paul (NCC/CS.)" <pts%bom.gov.au@localhost> wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Sun, 2007-08-26 at 11:42 -0400, César Catrián Carreño wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:07:49 +1000
> > > > "Paul (NCC/CS.)" <pts%bom.gov.au@localhost> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Can anyone help with this please?
> > > > > broken packages all over in latest pkgsrc!
> > > > > paul.
> > > > 
> > > > I started yesterday a bulk build of all my packages, using pkg_comp,
> > > > now that I've set X11 modular. Are you building all your X11 packages
> > > > from the beginning?
> > > 
> > > I don't have X11_TYPE set at all.
> > > I was just building it as a dependancy of evolution.
> > 
> > Besides, you seem to have two pkgsrc directories, you start compiling
> > at /usr/pkgsrc_CVS_250807 and the error code ends with /usr/pkgsrc . You
> > should start building all from /usr/pkgsrc .
> 
> It just looks like that.
> /usr/pkgsrc is a link to the fresh pkgsrc_CVS_250807.
> when i did make fetch-list |grep Fetch it came up with 
> libxrender as a dependency. So I tried to compile it.
> just to DO SOMETHING while I waited for the GREY LISTING
> to put through my post on -lpopt which still has no explanation.
> i won't worry about libXrender unless it comes up from a build
> from dir evolution.
> but as for -lpopt, JC Reed seems to think that I have to have 
> X11=modular for this?
> which I still don't understand.
> surely things should still build with the OLD x11 xfree86?

Sorry. I got this thread is about libXrender broken.

If we mix the two threads, you were about to get home to run the bmake
debug stuff.

If evolution needs libXrender in your pkgsrc tree, you have X11 modular
defined (as it seems to), and that is not what you want.

If the first error was about -lpopt, get the debug about it as you said.

If you pass over an error, you will get more errors. So stop and DO
NOTHING until you solve the first error.

Problems about the grey listing stuff are off-topic to this list/thread.

--
César Catrián Carreño

Attachment: pgpahBBbTElYw.pgp
Description: PGP signature



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index