Re: missing symlink in openoffice2-bin?

[Mark Davies <mark%mcs.vuw.ac.nz@localhost>]

On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Greg Troxel wrote:
> "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost> writes:
> >     cd /usr/pkg
> >     ln -s emul/linux/openoffice.org2.2
> >
> > Could someone check this?  My setup is a bit odd.
>
> I am seeing this to, and that fixes things for me.  But, I'm not at
> all sure what's correct.  Is there a grand plan for where Linux
> programs live on NetBSD/i386?  Sure, libraries unpacked from suse
> are in /emul/linux, but for example acroread7 installs under
> /usr/pkg but not emul.  Perhaps the bug is that most of oo is in
> emul/linux?

Is this a recent change related to the new emulator framework?  I 
haven't installed openoffice2-bin in a month or so but it has always 
installed directly into /usr/pkg for me.

cheers
mark