Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/devel/xulrunner

[Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost>]

Hi,

From: Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%joyent.com@localhost>, Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 
13:45:42 +0100

> * On 2013-05-19 at 11:01 BST, Ryo ONODERA wrote:
> 
>> > I don't understand it at all!
>> > Why don't you do that in WIP instead?
>> > 
>> > It is true that pkgsrc-current may be less stable than released,
>> > but since when it has become assumed that pkgsrc-current may be
>> > non-functional for sure?
>> 
>> I believe the problem of 21.0 is fixed in 22.0.
>> Of course, I can remove devel/xulrunner and re-add it when 22.0 is
>> released.
>> Which is better for pkgsrc?
> 
> I see no point at all in marking packages as BROKEN due to
> functionality issues.
> 
> I am currently working on these packages for SunOS support, and all
> that BROKEN is doing is hiding the compilation issues I need to fix.

I have found that firefox/xulrunner 22.0b1 has same problem.

I will commit xulrunner removal commit tonight (JST).
It is done in my local tree.

But I have no ssh connectivity now.

--
Ryo ONODERA // ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost
PGP fingerprint = 82A2 DC91 76E0 A10A 8ABB  FD1B F404 27FA C7D1 15F3