Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/devel/xulrunner

[Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%joyent.com@localhost>]

* On 2013-05-19 at 11:01 BST, Ryo ONODERA wrote:

> > I don't understand it at all!
> > Why don't you do that in WIP instead?
> > 
> > It is true that pkgsrc-current may be less stable than released,
> > but since when it has become assumed that pkgsrc-current may be
> > non-functional for sure?
> 
> I believe the problem of 21.0 is fixed in 22.0.
> Of course, I can remove devel/xulrunner and re-add it when 22.0 is
> released.
> Which is better for pkgsrc?

I see no point at all in marking packages as BROKEN due to
functionality issues.

I am currently working on these packages for SunOS support, and all
that BROKEN is doing is hiding the compilation issues I need to fix.

-- 
Jonathan Perkin  -  Joyent, Inc.  -  www.joyent.com