Re: pkg/52220: pkgsrc ../security/gnutls-3.5.9 fails to build on i386

[zilog%sdf.org@localhost]

Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost> wrote:

> The following reply was made to PR pkg/52220; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Cc: pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
> Subject: Re: pkg/52220: pkgsrc ../security/gnutls-3.5.9 fails to build on i386
> Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 13:01:04 +0200
>
>  On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 01:55:00AM +0000, zilog%sdf.org@localhost wrote:
>  > 	The ../security/gnutls package fails to build on i386.  Build
>  >         fails with follwoing errors:
>  
>  This is misleading. The problem is not gnutls, but the broken
>  libhogweed.so.
>  

Thanks for the feedback. I'm not a developer but yes, I noticed that
as well and mentioned it in the PR.  There is no libhogweed package in the pkgsrc
tree; the gnutls package imports it so I stand by my "../security/gnutls package
fails to build .." statement. Do you feel it would make sense to file a PR for
a non-existent package?

Jeff