[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg/43227: [math/py-rpy] Update to 1.0.3
Would some committer close this PR since it is
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:25 PM, wen heping <wenheping%gmail.com@localhost>
> The following reply was made to PR pkg/43227; it has been noted by GNATS.
> From: wen heping <wenheping%gmail.com@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
> Cc: OBATA Akio <obache%netbsd.org@localhost>
> Subject: Re: pkg/43227: [math/py-rpy] Update to 1.0.3
> Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 15:17:41 +0800
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:10 PM, OBATA Akio <obache%netbsd.org@localhost>
> > The following reply was made to PR pkg/43227; it has been noted by GNATS.
> > From: "OBATA Akio" <obache%netbsd.org@localhost>
> > To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
> > Cc:
> > Subject: Re: pkg/43227: [math/py-rpy] Update to 1.0.3
> > Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 16:07:58 +0900
> > =A0On Sun, 02 May 2010 12:25:03 +0900, wen heping
> <wenheping%gmail.com@localhost> w=
> > =A0> =A0> > > And why patch-ac is required?
> > =A0> =A0> > Without patch-ac, the build will fail.
> > =A0> =A0>
> > =A0> =A0> Is it came from API changes of R?
> > =A0> I think it is not the R API changes, but the include file of rpy cha=
> > =A0In other words,
> > =A0The patch probably means "R version XXX move YYY from Rdevices.h to Re=
> mbedded.h" or
> > =A0"Rdevices.h had been deprecated since R version XXX, so use Rembedded.=
> h for YYY".
> > =A0I said that it is API change of R.
> > =A0> =A0> In other words, if you built rpy with R-2.10.1, is it also usab=
> > =A0> =A0> with R-2.11.0?
> > =A0> No, when rpy build with R-2.10.1, it will install file r2101.so to t=
> > =A0> =A0target directory,
> > =A0> =A0while with R-2.11.0(which I send a PR to update it), it will inst=
> all r2110.so
> > =A0I want to know about ABI compatibility.
> > =A0If rpy will be built with R-2.11.1, r2111.so will be installed and wor=
> ks file.
> > =A0But how about a situation, if rpy-1.0.3 was built with R-2.11.0,
> > =A0then update R to 2.11.1 (no rebuild of rpy), is rpy-1.0.3 still usable=
> or need
> > =A0to rebuild with R-2.11.1?
> rpy-1.0.3 built with R-2.11.0 could not usable for R-2.11.1, the
> r2110.so in PLIST
> should change to r2111.so(I think rpy-0.98 the same)
> rpy should modify the PLIST every time R update.
> the rpy in FreeBSD portstrees was bumped portrevision for 13 times :)
Main Index |
Thread Index |