[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: PR/41021: devel/mk-files
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
> This is useless move but it requires testing, we have many other silly
> named packages in pkgsrc, but neither you nor anyone else propose to
> rename them.
Sorry this unrelated but I respond anyways. I have both proposed
changing package names in pkgsrc and I have also renamed packages in
> > Or pkgsrc/mk should be tested using the latest maintained mk-20100102
> > and that should be the only package (go ahead and name it "mk") and
> > bootstrap can install it if needed.
> I propose that you, Simon, and others willing persons elaborate anything
> acceptible for generic use. I admit that this is interesting project,
> I'd to participate in it as well if time affords. As for now, I propose
> to stop using bug tracker to discuss this. Lets' move to tech-pkg,
> we annoy others :)
The ticket is closed for now. It can be discussed on the list.
Main Index |
Thread Index |