Re: Re: pkg/38988: Upgrade package to 9.05

[Joel CARNAT <joel%carnat.net@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/38988; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Joel CARNAT <joel%carnat.net@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, 
pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Re: pkg/38988: Upgrade package to 9.05
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:37:58 +0000

 --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
 Content-Disposition: inline
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 Hello,
 
 Sorry for the delay.
 
 On Sun, Aug 10 2008 - 12:35, OBATA Akio wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/38988; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >=20
 > From: "OBATA Akio" <obache%netbsd.org@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Cc:=20
 > Subject: Re: pkg/38988: Upgrade package to 9.05
 > Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:30:36 +0900
 >=20
 >  On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:55:00 +0900, <joel%carnat.net@localhost> wrote:
 > =20
 >  >>Description:
 >  > This is just an upgrade to the latest stable version.
 >  > I never had issue with the previous one but the upgrade looked pretty =
 straight forward.
 > =20
 >  It seems not just an upgrade.
 >  There are some questions.
 > =20
 >  1. All CONFIGURE_* are removed.
 >     Are those option useless in 9.05?
 > =20
 
 Here's what I understood:
 --enable-transparency          defaults to YES
 --enable-menubar               Not Available (N/A)
 --enable-xpm-background                N/A
 --enable-xgetdefault           N/A
 --enable-24bit                 N/A
 
 Here's what my binary says:
 # urxvt --help
 rxvt-unicode (urxvt) v9.05 - released: 2008-06-15
 options: perl,xft,styles,combining,blink,iso14755,unicode3,encodings=3Deu+v=
 n+jp+jp-ext+kr+zh+zh-ext,fade,transparent,tint,XIM,frills,selectionscrollin=
 g,wheel,slipwheel,cursorBlink,pointerBlank,scrollbars=3Dplain+rxvt+NeXT+xte=
 rm
 Usage: urxvt [options] [-e command args]
 <snip>
 
 >  2. USE_FEATURES+=3Dsnprintf also missing.
 >     Is it changed not to use snprintf?
 
 I don't know.
 I first tried building without the option.
 And as it compiled and worked well, I didn't uncomment it.
 
 I left the line commented so that a someone knowing more about snprintf than
 I do could point out if this was an error.
 
 > =20
 >  3. post-install target(installation of documentation, termcap and termin=
 fo) is memoved.
 >     Why?
 > =20
 
 Same I above: I just run "make install && make print-PLIST > PLIST".
 Everything works OK so I didn't digg more.
 
 >  4. perl option is still alive in options.mk, but in Makefile, fixed to u=
 se perl and
 >     PLIST is uncondifionally.
 >     9.05 can't build without perl, or useless, or just forgotten?
 
 "--enable-perl" is a configure option.
 I removed "perl" from the Makefile and run "env
 PKG_OPTIONS.rxvt-unicode=3D-perl make package"
 It compiled OK but the package task stopped because some perl references
 where in PLIST but not installed.
 
 ##########
 =3D> Registering installation for rxvt-unicode-9.05
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File
 `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/block-graphics-to-ascii' is in +CONTENTS but
 not on filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File
 `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/digital-clock' is in +CONTENTS but not on
 filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File
 `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/example-refresh-hooks' is in +CONTENTS but not
 on filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/kuake' is in
 +CONTENTS but not on filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File
 `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/macosx-clipboard' is in +CONTENTS but not on
 filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/matcher' is
 in +CONTENTS but not on filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File
 `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/option-popup' is in +CONTENTS but not on
 filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/readline' is
 in +CONTENTS but not on filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File
 `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/remote-clipboard' is in +CONTENTS but not on
 filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File
 `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/searchable-scrollback' is in +CONTENTS but not
 on filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/selection'
 is in +CONTENTS but not on filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File
 `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/selection-autotransform' is in +CONTENTS but
 not on filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File
 `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/selection-pastebin' is in +CONTENTS but not on
 filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File
 `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/selection-popup' is in +CONTENTS but not on
 filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/tabbed' is
 in +CONTENTS but not on filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/urxvt-popup'
 is in +CONTENTS but not on filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File
 `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/perl/xim-onthespot' is in +CONTENTS but not on
 filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File `/usr/pkg/lib/urxvt/urxvt.pm' is in
 +CONTENTS but not on filesystem!
 pkg_admin: rxvt-unicode-9.05: File `/usr/pkg/man/man3/urxvtperl.3' is in
 +CONTENTS but not on filesystem!
 ##########
 
 So to answer your question, perl can be removed from Makefile and left
 as an options but PLIST has to be modified to reflect the fact that the
 perl options installs additional files. I'm not sure how to do that.
 
 > =20
 >  5. wip/libev/buildlink3.mk is commented out.
 >     9.05 should be used with libev package?
 
 I think it is.
 
 When I started building this package I read that it requires libev.
 So I tried adding a wip/libev first but couldn't succeed.
 I don't remember how&why but I discovered urxvt did provide libev in
 its source tree.
 
 I left the comment in the Makefile so that one can decide if it is
 better to have a separate libev package or use the provided one.
 
 > =20
 >  6. patch-ab is missing (fixes CVE-2008-1142).
 >     9.05 is not contains it (Just mentioned in man, default display is :0=
 ).
 >     Really no need the patch?=20
 > =20
 
 As far as I could understand the code, the source file seems to include
 the patch.
 
 Hope this helps.
 Regards,
        Jo
 
 
 
 --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 Content-Disposition: inline
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (NetBSD)
 
 iEYEARECAAYFAkikpbYACgkQ0/VH7L7F7Y7FvACbB95ecIPNDQjdJk9Gw50yZB1/
 FacAnRv01umWb0OtSh93XPsqpg3Dnkbt
 =1Jmo
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--