[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
The following reply was made to PR pkg/34444; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jason Lingohr <jason%lucid.net.au@localhost>
Subject: Re: pkg/34444
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 22:25:18 +1000
Actually, scratch that -- I'm wondering why --with-included-popt was
used instead of my patch?
I'd have thought my patch was a better solution? pkgsrc's popt is fine
for the build, it just needed to .include popt's buildlink info.
(I'm attempting a build with your fix right now for feedback, but am
interested to know why you chose this way.)
Main Index |
Thread Index |