Re: kern/58916: timerfd(2) claims ready for write

["Taylor R Campbell via gnats" <gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR kern/58916; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Taylor R Campbell <riastradh%NetBSD.org@localhost>
To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
Cc: Robert Elz <kre%NetBSD.org@localhost>,
	gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: kern/58916: timerfd(2) claims ready for write
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 13:57:15 +0000

 > Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:15:05 -0800
 > From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
 > 
 > In this case, I think it's better to file a bug against the Python
 > test suite.
 
 We can do that but I want to make sure we have a clear story for what
 timerfd(2) _should_ be doing so we have a compelling argument that it
 is a Python bug.
 
 Right now there's another part of the Python test suite that crashes
 the kernel, and on closer inspection -- in the course of writing tests
 to cover that case -- I'm not actually sure what the right thing is
 there (PR 58914).
 
 So I'm not about to go claiming bugs in other projects' code until I
 get this egg off our face!