Re: kern/58916: timerfd(2) claims ready for write

["Jason Thorpe via gnats" <gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR kern/58916; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
To: Taylor Campbell <campbell%mumble.net@localhost>
Cc: Robert Elz <kre%NetBSD.org@localhost>,
 "gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost" <gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost>,
 "netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost" <netbsd-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: kern/58916: timerfd(2) claims ready for write
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:15:05 -0800

 > On Dec 18, 2024, at 6:39=E2=80=AFPM, Taylor R Campbell =
 <campbell%mumble.net@localhost> wrote:
 >=20
 > (This came up in Python's automatic tests of select on timerfds,
 > details in <https://gnats.netbsd.org/58914>.  Happy to revert the
 > change.  Mainly I just want to make sure these timer- and timerfd-
 > related paths are adequately exercised with clear automatic tests that
 > cover enough to avoid gratuitous application incompatibility and
 > kernel crashes.)
 
 In this case, I think it=E2=80=99s better to file a bug against the =
 Python test suite.
 
 -- thorpej