[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: toolchain/49505 (Relocate Lua documentation?)
The following reply was made to PR toolchain/49505; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marc Balmer <marc%msys.ch@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, toolchain-manager%NetBSD.org@localhost,
gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, n54%gmx.com@localhost
Subject: Re: toolchain/49505 (Relocate Lua documentation?)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:33:04 +0100
Am 11.02.15 um 18:20 schrieb David Holland:
> The following reply was made to PR toolchain/49505; it has been noted by GNATS.
> From: David Holland <dholland-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Subject: Re: toolchain/49505 (Relocate Lua documentation?)
> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:15:00 +0000
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:41:54AM +0000, mbalmer%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
> > Lua can perfectly be used without the comp set installed. The two
> > new sections man3lua and man9lua make sense.
> The new sections may make sense, but they belong with the rest of the
> section 3 and section 9 docs. Asserting to the contrary doesn't change
> the situation.
No. As I said previously 3lua and 9lua are different from 3 and 9 and
describe a different set of functionality that is not directly related
to material in 3 and 9. And whereas 3 and 9 probably only make sense
when comp is installed, the stuff documented in 3lua and 9lua comes with
the base install and therefore this documentation come with the base
install in consequence.
Main Index |
Thread Index |