[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
re: kern/47029: We need shm_open() and shm_unlink()
The following reply was made to PR kern/47029; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>
Cc: kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
Subject: re: kern/47029: We need shm_open() and shm_unlink()
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:16:52 +1100
> From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Subject: Re: kern/47029: We need shm_open() and shm_unlink()
> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 21:00:27 +0100
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:30:01PM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> > Are these suitable for -6? (And if so, we'd probably better also get
> > the various recent tmpfs fixes...)
> Releng usually has issues with changing/adding APIs to release branches.
> But without the tmpfs fixes, this definitively can not be pulled up - so,
> are the tmpfs fixes good for pullup?
IMO, we should figure out what fixes we need for tmpfs for netbsd-6,
and we should ignore posix shm for netbsd-6 (for the normal reasons.)
Main Index |
Thread Index |