re: kern/47029: We need shm_open() and shm_unlink()

[matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>]

> From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Cc: 
> Subject: Re: kern/47029: We need shm_open() and shm_unlink()
> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 21:00:27 +0100
> 
>  On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:30:01PM +0000, David Holland wrote:
>  >  Are these suitable for -6? (And if so, we'd probably better also get
>  >  the various recent tmpfs fixes...)
>  
>  Releng usually has issues with changing/adding APIs to release branches.
>  
>  But without the tmpfs fixes, this definitively can not be pulled up - so,
>  are the tmpfs fixes good for pullup?

IMO, we should figure out what fixes we need for tmpfs for netbsd-6,
and we should ignore posix shm for netbsd-6 (for the normal reasons.)


.mrg.