NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: port-arm/48193: On NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el for Raspberry Pi, MACHINE_ARCH returns earm, but *hf* is expected in /usr/share/mk/bsd.own.mk .
The following reply was made to PR port-arm/48193; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: port-arm-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost,
gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
ryoon%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: port-arm/48193: On NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el for Raspberry Pi,
MACHINE_ARCH returns earm, but *hf* is expected in /usr/share/mk/bsd.own.mk .
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 01:22:53 -0700
On Sep 16, 2013, at 1:10 AM, Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>
=
wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR port-arm/48193; it has been noted =
by GNATS.
>=20
> From: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>
> To: matt%3am-software.com@localhost
> Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost
> Subject: Re: port-arm/48193: On NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el for Raspberry =
Pi, MACHINE_ARCH
> returns earm, but *hf* is expected in /usr/share/mk/bsd.own.mk =
.
> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:05:04 +0900
>=20
>> If you have a better suggestion, offer it on tech-kern.
>> pr-s are not a place for this discussion.
>=20
> My first question is:
>=20
>>> Is there any public discussion how we should switch sf and hf
>>> if they have the same ABI but just different default?
>=20
> If the answer is no, all your changes should be reverted before =
discussion.
Uh, no. It solves the PR. It even solves the problem of untarring a =
different
implementation in a chroot and then getting the right MACHINE_ARCH for =
that tree.
It can be backed out if and when someone comes up with a better =
solution.
If exposes bugs in NetBSD, so much the better so we can fix them.=
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index