[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: port-xen/47193: xenwatch handlers are added twice to the list of pending watches
The following reply was made to PR port-xen/47193; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
To: Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= <roger.pau%citrix.com@localhost>
Cc: "Cherry G.Mathew" <cherry%zyx.in@localhost>,
Subject: Re: port-xen/47193: xenwatch handlers are added twice to the list of
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:28:26 +0100
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:49:44PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > I don't know why gcc doesn't complain about repeated being possibly
> > uninitialised here. AFAIK repeated is initialised only in the found case.
> > repeated = false should probably be moved upper.
> I guess because if "repeated" is not initialized, it is not even
> checked, since the first part of the if condition "if (!found)" will
> always be true.
Right. But I guess the waring would trip with different optimisation
> I will move the initialization upper.
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |