[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: port-xen/47193: xenwatch handlers are added twice to the list of pending watches
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:49:44PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > I don't know why gcc doesn't complain about repeated being possibly
> > uninitialised here. AFAIK repeated is initialised only in the found case.
> > repeated = false should probably be moved upper.
> I guess because if "repeated" is not initialized, it is not even
> checked, since the first part of the if condition "if (!found)" will
> always be true.
Right. But I guess the waring would trip with different optimisation
> I will move the initialization upper.
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |