Re: port-xen/47193: xenwatch handlers are added twice to the list of pending watches

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:49:44PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > I don't know why gcc doesn't complain about repeated being possibly
> > uninitialised here. AFAIK repeated is initialised only in the found case.
> > repeated = false should probably be moved upper.
> 
> I guess because if "repeated" is not initialized, it is not even
> checked, since the first part of the if condition "if (!found)" will
> always be true.

Right. But I guess the waring would trip with different optimisation
options.

> I will move the initialization upper.

thanks

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--