[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: lib/46433: tests/lib/libm/t_exp should not use exp() itself
The following reply was made to PR lib/46433; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, isaki%NetBSD.org@localhost,
Subject: Re: lib/46433: tests/lib/libm/t_exp should not use exp() itself
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 00:47:10 +0900
> And once again, the idea has never been to skip tests but to report these
> as expected failures. As a developer, you should benefit from this as you
> see directly whether and when a bug is fixed. Thus, this particular case
> still requires the MD-specific check, which points to this PR upon failure.
Only if the test correctly fails on bogus implementation?
Tests which could return false positive won't show if a bug is fixed
and just hide bugs.
Main Index |
Thread Index |