Re: lib/46433: tests/lib/libm/t_exp should not use exp() itself

[Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR lib/46433; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>
To: jruohonen%iki.fi@localhost
Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, isaki%NetBSD.org@localhost, 
tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost
Subject: Re: lib/46433: tests/lib/libm/t_exp should not use exp() itself
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 00:47:10 +0900

 > And once again, the idea has never been to skip tests but to report these
 > as expected failures. As a developer, you should benefit from this as you
 > see directly whether and when a bug is fixed. Thus, this particular case
 > still requires the MD-specific check, which points to this PR upon failure.
 
 Only if the test correctly fails on bogus implementation?
 
 Tests which could return false positive won't show if a bug is fixed
 and just hide bugs.
 
 ---
 Izumi Tsutsui