NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: lib/46433: tests/lib/libm/t_exp should not use exp() itself
The following reply was made to PR lib/46433; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tetsuya Isaki <isaki%pastel-flower.jp@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, jruohonen%iki.fi@localhost
Cc: lib-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost,
gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: lib/46433: tests/lib/libm/t_exp should not use exp() itself
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 23:15:28 +0900
At Tue, 29 May 2012 11:50:04 +0000 (UTC),
Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> That is one option sure. But if there is no immedate fix available, we
> likely want to count these cases as expected failures. So I think we can put
> something like the following to the beginning of these cases:
>
> if (exp(1.0) == 0.0) {
> atf_tc_expect_fail("PR lib/46433");
> atf_tc_fail("exp(1.0) = 0.0");
> }
>
> [start the actual test]
How about this? (At first I rewrote about exp()/expf()
because I don't know about exp2()/exp2f() well...)
However, I'm not sure about its appropriate range and
appropriate epsilon.
Index: t_exp.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/tests/lib/libm/t_exp.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 t_exp.c
--- t_exp.c 18 Sep 2011 05:19:18 -0000 1.1
+++ t_exp.c 30 May 2012 14:09:56 -0000
@@ -32,6 +32,22 @@
#include <atf-c.h>
#include <math.h>
+/* y = exp(x) */
+static const struct {
+ double x;
+ double y;
+} exp_values[] = {
+ { -10, 0.4539992976248485e-4, },
+ { -5, 0.6737946999085467e-2, },
+ { -1, 0.3678794411714423, },
+ { -0.1, 0.9048374180359595, },
+ { 0, 1.0000000000000000, },
+ { 0.1, 1.1051709180756477, },
+ { 1, 2.7182818284590452, },
+ { 5, 148.41315910257660, },
+ { 10, 22026.465794806718, },
+};
+
/*
* exp2(3)
*/
@@ -305,22 +321,23 @@
ATF_TC(exp_product);
ATF_TC_HEAD(exp_product, tc)
{
- atf_tc_set_md_var(tc, "descr", "Test exp(x + y) == exp(x) * exp(y)");
+ atf_tc_set_md_var(tc, "descr", "Test some selected exp(x)");
}
ATF_TC_BODY(exp_product, tc)
{
#ifndef __vax__
- const double x[] = { 0.0, 1.1, 2.2, 3.3, 4.4, 5.5, 6.6, 7.7, 8.8 };
- const double y[] = { 8.8, 7.7, 6.6, 5.5, 4.4, 3.3, 2.2, 1.1, 0.0 };
+ double x;
+ double y;
const double eps = 1.0e-11;
size_t i;
- for (i = 0; i < __arraycount(x); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < __arraycount(exp_values); i++) {
+ x = exp_values[i].x;
+ y = exp_values[i].y;
- if (fabs(exp(x[i] + y[i]) - (exp(x[i]) * exp(y[i]))) > eps)
- atf_tc_fail_nonfatal("exp(%0.01f + %0.01f) != exp("
- "%0.01f) * exp(%0.01f)", x[i], y[i], x[i], y[i]);
+ if (fabs(exp(x) - y) > eps)
+ atf_tc_fail_nonfatal("exp(%0.01f) != %18.18e", x, y);
}
#endif
}
@@ -413,22 +430,23 @@
ATF_TC(expf_product);
ATF_TC_HEAD(expf_product, tc)
{
- atf_tc_set_md_var(tc, "descr", "Test expf(x+y) == expf(x) * expf(y)");
+ atf_tc_set_md_var(tc, "descr", "Test some selected expf(x)");
}
ATF_TC_BODY(expf_product, tc)
{
#ifndef __vax__
- const float x[] = { 0.0, 1.1, 2.2, 3.3, 4.4, 5.5, 6.6, 7.7, 8.8 };
- const float y[] = { 8.8, 7.7, 6.6, 5.5, 4.4, 3.3, 2.2, 1.1, 0.0 };
+ float x;
+ float y;
const float eps = 1.0e-2;
size_t i;
- for (i = 0; i < __arraycount(x); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < __arraycount(exp_values); i++) {
+ x = exp_values[i].x;
+ y = exp_values[i].y;
- if (fabsf(expf(x[i] + y[i]) - (expf(x[i]) * expf(y[i]))) > eps)
- atf_tc_fail_nonfatal("expf(%0.01f + %0.01f) != expf("
- "%0.01f) * expf(%0.01f)", x[i], y[i], x[i], y[i]);
+ if (fabsf(expf(x) - y) > eps)
+ atf_tc_fail_nonfatal("expf(%0.01f) != %18.18e", x, y);
}
#endif
}
---
Tetsuya Isaki <isaki%pastel-flower.jp@localhost / isaki%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index