NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
kern/45935: Requested change to comments in sys/param.h
>Number: 45935
>Category: kern
>Synopsis: Requested change to comments in sys/param.h
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: high
>Responsible: kern-bug-people
>State: open
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Mon Feb 06 12:30:01 +0000 2012
>Originator: Robert Elz
>Release: NetBSD current (patch to 5.99.64 included) but irrelevant...
>Organization:
Prince of Songkla University
>Environment:
System: NetBSD jade.coe.psu.ac.th 5.1_STABLE NetBSD 5.1_STABLE
(JADE-1.12-20120130) #27: Tue Jan 31 05:20:31 ICT 2012
kre%jade.coe.psu.ac.th@localhost:/usr/obj/5/kernels/i386/JADE i386
Architecture: i386
Machine: i386
>Description:
The comments in sys/param.h no longer accurately reflect
the way the __NetBSD_Version__ macro is defined (as illustrated
by the historical record).
On tech-kern a while ago, I asked for a clarification of the
rules for use of __NetBSD_Version__ and received no reply
(which suggests that no-one actually knows).
Aside: there were replies on a few side issues, but no reply that
actually said "this is the policy" or "the policy can
be found in ..."
Hence, I am proposing some rules that seem to match the way the
macro has been used in the (relatively) recent past - that is,
no-one cases about 1.6ZA any more, and I supply here a patch to
param.h that documents, in comments (the patch is almost exclusively
to comments) my suggested rules.
By all means make a different change if the rules I'm suggesting
aren't what ought to be used, but please make some change so
everyone knows just how __NetBSD_Version__ is intended to be used
(it seems fairly well understood for NetBSD-current, and barely
comprehended elsewhere).
If the preference is to keep param.h smaller, then remove all of
the explanation from there (the current incorrect version, and
my suggested change), but do put it somewhere else.
>How-To-Repeat:
By inspection of sys/param.h along with a grep for __NetBSD_Version__
in the master cvs file to see the various values it has taken over
the years (I'm not going to waste space by including that here).
>Fix:
My suggested patch is appended. Apply this, or something else.
Note: this patch also removes __NetBSD_Prereq__() which everyone
seems agree should go, but doesn't replace it with anything
along the lines David Holland suggested - by all means defer that
change until he is ready to make it, this is just my nudge/vote!
(That was the "almost" in the "almost exclusively to comments" above)
Also note: in patch format some (well, one) of the lines below extend
(just) beyond 80 columns, but if incorporated into param.h, nothing
goes wider than column 80.
I'd actually like to change the definition of __NetBSD_Version__
to be (with appropriate numbers in place of M m and p of course):
#define __NetBSD_Version__ (__NetBSD_VersID__(M,m,p)) /* cmt */
and add
#define __NetBSD_VersID__(M,m,p) \
(((M) * 100000000) + \
((m) * 1000000) + \
((p) * 100))
and when z (see the patch) != 0
#define __NetBSD_Version__ (__NetBSD_VersID__(M,m,p)+z)
But I thought that too much of a variation for this change request,
which is really just trying to clarify the rules. Building the
version this way would avoid the error that occurred with 3.0.1 (etc)
where the "1" was inserted into the wrong column, making the
version in __NetBSD_Version__ meaning 3.0.10 where the comment said
3.0.1 (and the latter was clearly intended).
--- /release/current/usr/src/sys/sys/param.h 2012-02-05 21:28:51.000000000
+0700
+++ param.h 2012-02-06 19:12:30.000000000 +0700
@@ -47,12 +47,73 @@
#define BSD4_4 1
/*
- * #define __NetBSD_Version__ MMmmrrpp00
+ * #define __NetBSD_Version__ MMmmrrppzz
*
* M = major version
* m = minor version; a minor number of 99 indicates current.
* r = 0 (*)
* p = patchlevel
+ * z = trivia discriminator
+ *
+ * __NetBSD_Version__ is formed:
((M*100000000)+(m*1000000)+(r*10000)+(p*100)+z)
+ *
+ * 0 <= M < 42 (by the time this is a problem, the restriction will go)
+ * 0 <= m <= 99
+ * r = 0 (field not currently used)
+ * m == 99 ? 0 <= p <= 9999 : 0 <= p <= 99
+ * 0 <= z <= 99
+ *
+ * For NetBSD-current (developing next major release which will be (M+1).0)
+ * m == 99
+ * p initially 0, then incremented for every internal ABI change
+ * z is always 0
+ *
+ * For releases and other "stable" versions
+ * M == major release number (remains constant for a branch)
+ * for new major releases, incr(M); m=0; p=0; z=0
+ * m == minor release number
+ * releases with new functionality: incr(m); p=0; z=0
+ * p == patchlevel indicator
+ * security and serious fixes only, each new release incr(p); z=0
+ * z == version bump counter
+ * incremented (from 0) if any change is included that would
+ * result in a different release set (even a typo in a comment...)
+ * from any previously released, or almost released, version.
+ * (A version is "almost released" once it is tagged in CVS).
+ *
+ * __NetBSD_Version__ must be altered for all ABI changes in -current
+ * (multiple ABI changes with one increase in p is OK)
+ * and for every new release that is made for patch/feature releases.
+ *
+ * Note: The comment on the #define of __NetBSD_Version__ is important
+ * and must also be maintained correctly:
+ *
+ * In released versions (anything prepared as binary sets for distribution)
+ * NetBSD M.m (if p == 0)
+ * or
+ * NetBSD M.m.p (if p != 0)
+ * In release candidates (pre-release test versions) it will be
+ * NetBSD M.m_ZZZ
+ * where "ZZZ" is "ALPHA", "BETA" or "RC"; often with a number appended.
+ * In release candidates __NetBSD_Version__ should be set to the value
+ * for the release being prepared. If changes are required, other than
+ * to the __NetBSD_Version__ definition line itself, then incr(z) for
+ * the next test release or the final release. There are no release
+ * candidates for minor (point) releases - hence no need for M.m.p_ZZZ.
+ * In NetBSD-current the comment should say
+ * NetBSD M.99.p
+ * In major branches (between releases) it should say
+ * NetBSD M.m_STABLE
+ * In minor branches (between releases) it should say
+ * NetBSD M.m.p_PATCH
+ * for the latter 2 cases, __NetBSD_Version__ will remain at the last
+ * released value for the appropriate branch between releases.
+ * These versions should only be seen by end users who checkout from CVS.
+ *
+ * No (unnecessary) leading 0's in numeric values in the comment, that is:
+ * use NetBSD 5.99.1 not NetBSD 5.99.01 and NetBSD 5.0.1 not NetBSD 5.0.01
+ *
+ * Nothing else is permitted in the comment on the #define.
*
* When new releases are made, src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/tmac/mdoc.local
* needs to be updated and the changes sent back to the groff maintainers.
@@ -65,9 +126,6 @@
#define __NetBSD_Version__ 599006400 /* NetBSD 5.99.64 */
-#define __NetBSD_Prereq__(M,m,p) (((((M) * 100000000) + \
- (m) * 1000000) + (p) * 100) <= __NetBSD_Version__)
-
/*
* Historical NetBSD #define
*
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index