Re: Confidential field (sent to netbsd-bugs only for now)

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 05:13:01PM -0500, Matthew Mondor wrote:
> As for instance was the case for PR post-i386/45632.  I think that
> either one of the message or script is buggy, as the field ends up with
> the value 'no'.
> 
> The PR can still be queried by number via the HTTP
> interface, and its initial and followup messages also still get shown
> on the bug mailing lists...

Yes, because I (the netbsd-bugs mailing list owner) got the PR as a bounce
and decided the "confidential" was very likely in error, approved the 
original mail and fixed the state in gnats manually.

Gnats does not log this kind of manual status changes though.

Martin