[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/41935: Addition to umass(4) man-page
The following reply was made to PR kern/41935; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed%reedmedia.net@localhost>
Subject: Re: kern/41935: Addition to umass(4) man-page
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:51:10 -0500 (CDT)
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Matthew Mondor wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:50:01 +0000 (UTC)
> Jukka Ruohonen <jruohonen%iki.fi@localhost> wrote:
> > >Synopsis: Addition to umass(4) man-page
> I'm somewhat surprised that umass(4) has a list considering that the
> goal is implementation of the USB standard Mass Storage class, where
> all compatible devices should work.
> That said, there are many devices that don't fully comply to the UMASS
> protocol, which might explain such a list? If we listed all working
> devices, there might be several thousand to add I think...
> Should we keep adding every known to work device to that list?
> Otherwise, should the currently very partial list be kept?
I have two different devices than simply hang "mount". I received an
email off-list about this same topic saying that many have reported that
UMASS for most devices doesn't work and that a list of confirmed working
devices is needed.
Main Index |
Thread Index |