NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: port-amd64/40991: Include uhmodem(4) in the GENERIC amd64 config
The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/40991; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Evaldo Gardenali <evaldo%gardenali.biz@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: port-amd64/40991: Include uhmodem(4) in the GENERIC amd64 config
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:58:34 +0000
Hi
There seems to be some missed detail in my previous email.
As included in PR port-amd64/41174 (previously mentioned), the traceback
is in
http://evaldo.gardenali.biz/NetBSD-5.99.10-amd64/DSCN1722.JPG
http://evaldo.gardenali.biz/NetBSD-5.99.10-amd64/DSCN1724.JPG
Again, since they are different issues, this one could be fixed
independently of the other. When I boot with the device already
plugged, it works absolutely fine.
Regards
Evaldo
Christos Zoulas wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/40991; it has been noted by
> GNATS.
>
> From: christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost,
> port-amd64-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost,
> gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
> evaldo%gardenali.biz@localhost
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: port-amd64/40991: Include uhmodem(4) in the GENERIC amd64 config
> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:21:23 -0400
>
> On Apr 9, 3:50am, evaldo%gardenali.biz@localhost (Evaldo Gardenali) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: port-amd64/40991: Include uhmodem(4) in the GENERIC amd64
> con
>
> | I have validated the need for this to be implemented today.
> |
> | Having plugged the modem in before boot, I were able to fully utilize
> | the modem, with decent latency and bandwidth, excellent stability
> | (enough to cvs checkout src/ using cvs-over-ssh)
> |
>
*********************************************************************
> | Hotplugging with latest 5.99.10 kernel gave me crashes, filed as
> | port-amd64/41174
>
*********************************************************************
> |
> | Having this in 5.0/amd64 would be great. I am not sure there is still
> | time, but this modem sold extremely well in the last year in Brazil. Too
> | many people are using it, would be nice to have it well supported. Will
> | try to test on 5.0_RC3/amd64 as soon as I can.
> |
>
> Can we have a traceback? I don't have a modem myself to test.
>
> christos
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index