[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: xfail: expected failures
On Fri Jun 25 2010 at 23:58:21 +0100, Julio Merino wrote:
> >> Please take a look at this design proposal I have written for the feature:
> >> http://www.julipedia.org/projects/atf/trac/wiki/DesignXFail
> >> It is a bit different from your current implementation but I think
> >> covers all use cases that we discussed. Comments?
> > Looks good, but it doesn't cover timeout (which I missed in the original
> > implementation). Notably, timeout doesn't work either if you run the
> > test by hand.
> What do you mean? Expect a timeout?
Yea, or, well, more like expect the test case to hang.
> > I find the name atf_tc_expect_pass() confusing, though.
> How so? I find it pretty representative compared to the other cases ;-P
Does it have any other meaning that "xfail test will fail here"? If not,
why not name it accordingly. If it does, it's not obvious to me from
Main Index |
Thread Index |