[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: xfail: expected failures
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Antti Kantee <pooka%cs.hut.fi@localhost> wrote:
> Xfail will be present in atf 0.10 (according to Julio ;). The current
> implementation is a big binary hammer, meaning it is not possible to
> specify where the test is expected to fail. This may change for the
> 0.10 release. If anyone has any other ideas about what they would like to
> see in the this department, I guess now would be a good time to speak up.
Please take a look at this design proposal I have written for the feature:
It is a bit different from your current implementation but I think
covers all use cases that we discussed. Comments?
Main Index |
Thread Index |