[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: failures with NetBSD
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:43:51PM +0100, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
> before the conversion to ATF). I guess I really have to add an
> "Expected failure" output for test cases (it's in the to-do list for
> 0.6), so that we can clearly mark those that we know are broken and
> thus prevent confusion to end users.
I think "expected failure" is confusing - maybe add a "known to fail"
result and allow outputing some helpfull comment (like "PR bin/xxxxx")?
Main Index |
Thread Index |